BR-AF-03: An Invoice that contains a Document level allowance (BG-20) where the Document level…

The rule is fatal. In UBL, if an invoice contains a document-level allowance (cac:AllowanceCharge with cbc:ChargeIndicator=false()) whose cac:TaxCategory/cbc:ID is L and whose tax scheme ID upper-cased is VAT, then the invoice must also contain at least one of: a cac:AccountingSupplierParty/cac:Party/cac:PartyTaxScheme/cbc:CompanyID, or a cac:TaxRepresentativeParty/cac:PartyTaxScheme[cac:TaxScheme/normalize-space(upper-case(cbc:ID)) = 'VAT']/cbc:CompanyID. If no such allowance exists, the rule passes. In CII, a matching allowance is ram:SpecifiedTradeAllowanceCharge with ram:ChargeIndicator/udt:Indicator=false() and ram:CategoryTradeTax with ram:CategoryCode='L' and upper-case ram:TypeCode='VAT'; if such an allowance exists, the invoice must contain ram:SellerTradeParty/ram:SpecifiedTaxRegistration/ram:ID with @schemeID either VA or FC, or ram:SellerTaxRepresentativeTradeParty/ram:SpecifiedTaxRegistration/ram:ID with @schemeID='VA'. The message says BT-95 is “IGIC”, but the test checks category/code L under a VAT scheme, not a literal “IGIC” value.

If an invoice has the described document-level allowance, add at least one of the seller identifiers. In UBL, put a cbc:CompanyID inside cac:AccountingSupplierParty/cac:Party/cac:PartyTaxScheme, or inside cac:TaxRepresentativeParty/cac:PartyTaxScheme where the tax scheme is VAT. In CII, add ram:SpecifiedTaxRegistration/ram:ID in ram:SellerTradeParty with schemeID VA or FC, or in ram:SellerTaxRepresentativeTradeParty with schemeID VA. If no such document-level allowance is present, the rule is satisfied and no identifier is required by this rule. Note the message says “IGIC” but the test checks for code L; ensure the allowance's category/code matches what the test expects (L under VAT) before relying on this rule.